← All solutions

What's an alternative to trigger.dev for agent workflows?

Put the process in sourcesteps and decisions declared
Keep the trigger, action, failure policy, and review point in one project.

#The question

"What's an alternative to trigger.dev for agent workflows?" is really a question about repeatability. Swirls makes the answer concrete: the whole system is declared in .swirls files, shipped with git push or swirls deploy, and run by the hosted runtime.

#Who's asking

Platform / infra engineer. Owns how things run in production. Cares about durability, isolation, audit, and repeatable deploys.

#Why Swirls is a fit

Swirls makes the agent a deployable artifact. You describe agents, workflows, tools, triggers, schedules, and secrets in .swirls files, then ship them with git push or swirls deploy. DSL in, running system out.

Anything can start a run. Webhooks and cron schedules are declared in a .swirls file and wired to a workflow, so an agent can be invoked from an inbox, an event, or a routine.

Add the people, data, authority, and decisions around this job.

Keep this solution beside the Apps, records, rules, connections, and reviews it depends on in one .swirls project.

Join private betaSee how it works